There are two sides to many stories in today’s world, whether it is sports, politics, the economy, or a host of other topics. People just can’t agree on some things.
In the dance world, one topic often bantered about with opinions on both sides is whether or not Competitive Dance is a sport. This topic can spur a lot of passionate discussion.
Below are some perspectives on both sides of the topic. But first, here is a commonly used definition of the term sport, “sport is an activity involving physical exertion and skill in which an individual or team competes against another or others for entertainment.”
Yes! Competitive Dance is a Sport
By the classic definition above, it seems Competitive Dance would be a sport as it clearly involves physical exertion, skill, and dancers compete against each other either individually or as a team.
Dance requires stamina, flexibility, and endurance, and dancers need to be in excellent physical shape. They must practice to hone their skills much like athletes competing in sports such as football, baseball, gymnastics, and a host of others.
Another element of the term sport is competing. Clearly Competitive Dancers have the opportunity to compete against other dancers in events that have a specific judging system. There are winners established as part of these competitions.
So, the contention here is that based on the above definition and the comparison to so-called other “mainstream” sports, dance is indeed a sport practiced by both women and men.
No! Competitive Dance is a NOT a Sport
People that weigh in on this side of the discussion will often state that dance, above all else, is an art form, and that dance competitions have taken dance further away from its true essence.
The purpose of dance is to enchant an audience, expressing emotion and telling an affecting story. In this light, dance would compare more to the world of acting or the theater. The essence of dance is the artistry and creative expression.
To combat the comparisons to gymnastics and ice skating, proponents of this side of the debate will tell you that the judging systems are more subjective in dance, and dance competition don’t require specific moves that have to be incorporated into routines.
The final argument is that, above all else, a dancer is an artist.
What is the Correct Answer to this Debate?
I hate to sound like I am “copping out” on this debate, but there are compelling arguments on both sides of the debate.
There is no question that competitive dancers can be incredible athletes, but at the same time they, like an actor/artist, are masters of creative expression.
Whatever side of the debate you weigh in on, you have to admit there is no easy answer to this age old question. So, what do you think? Please share your comments below.
